24 C
Sierra Leone
Wednesday, February 1, 2023

SLPP raises alarm

HomeAYV NewsSLPP raises alarm

SLPP raises alarm

Date:

Related stories

NDMA Engages Communities on Fire Prevention

AYV News February 1, 2023 The National Disaster Management Agency...

CTC Mining pays Le1.9B surface rent to Marampa, Mafokie chiefdoms

Guest Writer February 1, 2023 The Commodity Trading Company (CTC)...

Lands Ministry, TAF Global to Build 5,000 Homes in Sierra Leone

AYV News February 1, 2023 Sierra Leone’s Ministry of Lands, Housing...

 

Neither the government nor any of the four public entities investigated by the office of the auditor general had made any public statement so far but the minister of information, Mohamed Bangura, and the majority leader and head of government business   in   parliament,   Ibrahim   Bundu,   MP,   had   addressed   the   issue   of government’s decision to look at the possibility of removing fuel subsidies. Minister   Bangura had   told journalists at his Youyi Building in Freetown that: “Subsidies on fuel are costing the government some Le400 billion annually. In the first half of this year we have spent Le89.5 billion, which could be converted to other sectors,” adding that the money saved from the exercise could then be used to finance other on-going projects.

“Fuel smuggling to neighbouring Guinea and Liberia means our government is paying subsidy for them as well”, he maintained, adding that they had been advised to engage and raise awareness among Sierra Leoneans, but said they were not afraid to make the decision to remove subsidies.

·         Deputy Minister of information, Cornelius Devaux, had said that the decision to dispose of government quarters on a case-by-case basis had been reached in a cabinet conclusion in 2001 by the SLPP which was in government at the time. He argues that they were merely trying to make “the process looks fair”.

On 3 September, 2016 the government reached a decision in cabinet to take serious measure to tackle the economic slowdown, proposing several cuts in spending.

The latest statement by the SLPP was in apparent response to the desperate austerity measures, saying they were proofs the government was doing badly.  

“On October 6, 2016, the SLPP in a press conference on austerity measures instituted by the government to address economic problem, attributed the dismal economic situation   among   other   things,   to   corrupt   practices   including   overpricing   of government   contracts,   abuse   of   duty   waivers   and   high   public   spending   on ostentatious goods.

“The Audit Service Sierra Leone recently laid before Parliament a report on the audit of   the   procurement   activities in selected public sector   activities   for   the   period January to October 2015 thereby validating the position of the SLPP. The audit covered   5   government   agencies   namely,   Ministries   of   Defence,   Education, Agriculture, Sierra Leone Police and Western Area District Councils with total actual expenditure (excluding salaries and wages) for 2015 of Le 427.4 billion representing nearly a quarter of actual national expenditure”.

Making reference to some of the key findings in the report, released in September on the government’s procurement activities for the period January to October 2015, and using   baseline   indicators   of   the   organisation   for   economic   co-operation   and development, OECD, to measure overall performance in audit, the SLPP said “there are substantial evidence of breaches in laws and regulations relating to procurement indicative of massive fraud and corruption”.

“Overall the indicator tool showed a score of 1.4 on a scale of 4 (representing 35% efficiency in procurement) compared to 1.8 in 2013 (representing 45% efficiency in procurement). This means a 22% deterioration in efficiency in procurement between 2013 and 2015”, the statement said, adding that there were appallingly poor internal controls such as inadequate segregation of duties, poorly trained procurement staff and weak record-keeping.

The   SLPP   further  complained   that   there   were   “evidence   of   restrictive   bidding criteria,   unfair   application   of   criteria,   excessive   price   variations,   unreasonable ignoring of  lowest bidder,  excessive use  of restricted bidding or sole sourcing, ignoring   of   technical   advice,   incomplete   and   unavailable   documentation,  specifications tailored towards a predetermined supplier, ignoring some selection criteria   among   others”,   adding   that   one   notable   example   of   leakages   from procurement was the overpricing of US$12.5 million (estimated at Le 87.5 billion) for the purchase of arms and ammunition costing US$46.9 million (estimated at Le 328.3 billion).

“The report notes that the procurement process was skewed to deliberately allow for incurring additional costs, thereby preventing transparent, competitive, economical and cost effective procurement. In short, the Ministry of Defence in 2015 cost the public purse an unnecessary US$12.5 million at a time when the government was desperately seeking cash to meet its basic obligations to the citizens of Sierra Leone”.

Please read the rest of the statement verbatim

The SLPP considers the  decision  to  buy arms and   ammunition worth  US$46.9 million or Le 328.3 billion) at a time we need all resources for post-Ebola recovery and provide basic services for all people not only as misallocation of public money but an act intended for huge kickbacks. To better understand the implications of such decision, the amount for purchase of arms and ammunition exceeds what government spends on fuel subsidy for two years (estimated at about Le 300 billion).

The   amount spent   on   arms   and   ammunition   also   exceeds   the   total   budgetary allocation of Le262.7 billion to the health sector in 2015 by about 25%. Additionally, this amount is more than enough to provide 500 new classrooms. With a national average   of   50   pupils   per   classroom,   this   amount   can   provide   classroom accommodation for at least 24,000 pupils. This will eliminate the double shift system in at least western area.

(v)   Another   example   relates   to   the   purchase   of   fertilizer   by   the   Ministry   of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Security (MAFFS). MAFFS budgeted Le 11.03 billion for the purchase of 21,000 bags of fertilizers as stated in its procurement plan. Had the ministry awarded the contract to Premier Logistic at a price of Le 10.28 billion, a potential saving of Le 756 million could have been made. In addition, it could have cost the ministry US$1,706,400 to purchase 18,000 bags of fertilizer from Premier Logistic. When compared to US$1,142,000 cost incurred buying 18,000 from Royal International, it could have led to an additional saving of US$435,600 (US$2,142,000- 1,706,000) equivalent to Le 2.25 billion. Total potential savings is Le 3,003,000 (Le 756,000,000 +Le 2,247,000). The report states that, had the ministry placed value-for- money at the centre of its decision-making process, a net amount of Le 3 billion of public funds would have been saved.

The SLPP notes with consternation that despite the efforts by the former government to enact the Public Procurements Act 2006 and the Government of Budgeting and Accountability Act 2005, among many others, in order to improve on economic governance, the current Government has persistently abused the provisions in these Acts and destroyed the institutions that were set up under these Acts thereby imposing considerable loss to the state.

To address this malaise, the SLPP calls on (i) the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) to speedily investigate all the indications of corruption highlighted in the Audit Reports since 2010 and persecute all those who are directly or indirectly causing   such   huge   loss   to   government   (ii)   Civil   Society   Organizations   (CSOs) working on governance and accountability to join the SLPP to ensure the ACC acts on Audit reports.

Sale of Government Quarters

In 2001, the SLPP government suggested in Cabinet to sell government quarters.

After careful policy review, the SLPP government realized it was not in public interest and therefore abandoned the decision to sell the government quarters. The rethink was based on the facts that the sale of government quarters will impose additional burden in the form of rents allowance and reduce the incentive to the Civil Service thereby discouraging sound professionals entering or continuing in the civil service.

About 15 years later, the current government in a callous manner has decided to sell these   valuable   government   quarters   in   order   to   raise   revenue   to   finance   its administration. The SLPP continues to believe that the policy to sell government quarters is wrong and not in public interest and is only proposed to fill the fiscal gap this government has created for itself. This policy is awesome for the following reasons viz:

First,   without   the   quarters,   the   government   will   be   forced   to   pay   huge   rent allowances which may exceed the cost of repairing these quarters.

Second, it will not encourage new entrants into a poorly paid civil service.

Third, SLPP holds the view that the Government only want to use this as a means to loot state resources. The poor records in procurement is sufficient evidence to show that the sale of these assets will not be without problems. Cronies of the ruling Government   will   be   favored   and   persons   perceived   to   be   anti-   APC   will   be disadvantaged.  

The SLPP therefore urges the government to stop this bad policy and instead focus on developing a comprehensive national housing program. The SLPP is prepared to work with government to design a bi-partisan 20-year National Housing Program.

This   program   should   be   enacted   into   law   and   it   will   be   mandatory   on   any government to continue implementing it.   Also, the fact that the Government has illegally sold many state’s asset, the SLPP also calls on Civil Society Organizations and all well-meaning Sierra Leone to join the national campaign to recover and protect state’s asset. 

Removal of Subsidy from Petroleum Products

The attention of the SLPP has been drawn to the plan by this government to remove subsidy on petroleum products. Whilst the SLPP recognizes the probable long-term benefit of this policy, the Party is opposed to it now for the following reasons:

i. First, the timing is wrong. The removal of subsidy will worsen the already growing hardship on the population. In this situation of economic austerity and hardship, with inflation in double digit, any attempt to remove subsidy without any mitigating measures will worsen the already bad situation. The removal will lead to increased transport costs causing ripple effects on other sectors of the economy, notably agriculture which revolve around transportation. Also, there will be increase in cost of small scale business services. These businesses depend on subsidized fuel to render services as public electricity is not reliable and recently made expensive.

Additionally, the removal of subsidy will increase cost of production. Factories and industries   that   depend   on   petroleum   products   and   goods   transportation   will experience some difficulty and have to increase production costs in order to meet market demands and finally will open the floodgates of inflation, thereby drowning all prospects to sustainable development.

ii. Second, the SLPP believes there are many areas in the budget the government can make   savings   and at the same time continue   subsidizing   petroleum   products.

Eliminating overpricing of goods or inflating of contracts and reduced spending on ostentatious goods such as huge security apparatus and vehicle maintenance can cause substantial savings for government.

A good example is US$12.5 million (about Le 87.5 billion) overpricing of  necessary arms and ammunition valued at US$46.9 million as highlighted in the Audit Report on Procurement Activities for 2015. There are many other areas indicated in the report where contracts were inflated. Adding other   areas   in other   sectors   outside the report   will   provide   more   savings   for government to continue to provide Le 150 billion per year and at the same time finance essential social services. 

iii. Third, smuggling is used as a smoke-screen or propaganda taunt to divert the attention of the populace that our national currency is on a nose dive. The SLPP is of the   view   that   the   current   government   cannot   gloss   over   the   reality-that   the purchasing power-parity of the Leone vis-à-vis the Franc Guinean has depreciated considerably since last year by 20%

Until the value of the Leone takes an upward turn the problem will continue to persist not only on fuel but all commodities including rice. With the current rate of exchange the Franc-Guinean can buy more goods in our markets at cheaper cost.

The answer to the problem is for Government to scale down drastically public expenditure that   will   reduce the   awesome budget deficit   and reduce   the   total aggregate supply of the Leone in the market. We are now confronted with the fact that eschewing an ounce of prevention, a pound of cure has become necessary. 

The SLPP therefore urges this government to maintain the subsidy on petroleum products by identifying other sources of savings of government spending to finance the subsidy and target it so that more poor people than rich persons will benefit. If this   government   is   to   continue   with   the   subsidy   removal   in   line   with   IMF requirements, SLPP recommends that government institute measures and develops programs to cushion the impacts of the subsidy removal. Such programs can be partly financed by the cut-backs in subsidy. Also, the Party would like to caution

CSOs who have been hired to misinform the public on this policy to stop this practice   and   encourage   more   progressive   CSOs   including   the   trade   unions   to campaign against this killer policy.

Business News

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once