29 C
Sierra Leone
Sunday, February 5, 2023

ECOWAS Court, Wanza Boat, Samsumana Case

HomeAYV NewsECOWAS Court, Wanza Boat, Samsumana Case

ECOWAS Court, Wanza Boat, Samsumana Case

Date:

Related stories

Retail Fuel Pump Prices Adjusted to NLe21.5

Following the recent upsurge in the global prices of...

This is a golden era for women, girls in Sierra Leone …President Bio tells school going pupils in Bo city

By Joseph S. Margai, Strategic Communication Coordinator President Julius Maada...

Sierra Leone Nursing, Midwifery Council Act Passed in Parliament

The Parliament of Sierra Leone has debated intensively and...

It can be recalled that following the denial by the Government of Sierra Leone to adhere to the ECOWAS Court judgment on the Government of Sierra Leone versus former Vice President Samuel Sam-sumana matter, there have been discussions on social and mainstream media questioning government’s decision for not honoring the judgment when the same government in 2008 honoured the same court’s judgment on the Wanza versus Government of Sierra Leone matter.

Speaking to AYV newspaper over the weekend, the attorney general said the Wanza case could not in any way be related to the Sam-sumana case.

According to him, the Wanza case was a contractual dispute and claims for breach of contract and that it was never heard nor decided by the country’s Supreme Court before being taken to the ECOWAS Court for a second judgment.

The attorney general said the Sam-sumana case was one for purported violation of fundamental human rights, a case he said that has been heard and settled by Sierra Leone’s Supreme Court which is the final court that can interpret the Sierra Leone Constitution, before being taken to the ECOWAS Court.

He went on that the ECOWAS has no jurisdiction over the Sierra Leone Supreme Court and could not in any way decide on a matter that has already been decided on by the country’s Supreme Court.

He said there is no real factual and legal basis for Sierra Leone’s Supreme Court to share its powers and jurisdiction with any other court, adding that Sierra Leone Government has rejected the Court judgment in the Sam-sumana case on the grounds of lack of competent jurisdiction and equally noted that there is no real factual and legal basis for Sierra Leone’s Supreme Court to share its powers and jurisdiction with any other court.

The attorney general’s legal analysis is validated and supported by the sister jurisdiction of the Republic of Ghana. It seems naturally that the mandate and jurisdiction of these Organizational Courts be revisited and repositioned to the original roles they were designed to achieve in the case of the ECOWAS Court, to resolve economic and commerce disputes with the ECOWAS community.

Business News

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once