35.4 C
Sierra Leone
Thursday, May 9, 2024

COI Judgment: Former Deputy Minister forfeits property to State

HomeNewsCourtsCOI Judgment: Former Deputy Minister forfeits property to State

COI Judgment: Former Deputy Minister forfeits property to State

Date:

Related stories

Sierra Leone Judiciary hosts first ECOWAS Court Conference

The Judiciary of Sierra Leone is all set to...

Supreme Court Judge takes Oath of Office

His Excellency President Dr Julius Maada Bio has presided...

Court Martial on November 26, 2023 Failed Coup: 27 Serving Soldiers charged with 88 Counts

Twenty-Seven serving military personnel of the Republic of Sierra...

Fake Landlord sentenced to 3 months in prison

Magistrate Sahr Kekura of the Pademba Road Court No....

Court of Appeal Judges, Hon. Justices Komba Kamanda, Hon. Fatmatta Bintu Alhadi and Hon. Tonia Barnett have ruled that the landed property of former Deputy Minister of Mines, Abdul Ignosi Koroma, situated at Railway Line, Teko Road, Makeni and valued at Le6,400,000,000, be forfeited to the State.

The President of Sierra Leone by Constitutional Instrument No. 64 of 2018 pursuant to Section 147 of the Constitution of Sierra Leone, Act No. 6 of 1991 set up the Justice Biobele Georgewill Commission of Inquiry with the said Judge as Chairman and Sole Commissioner.

 

The terms of reference of the Commission of Inquiry known as COI were laid down in Section 4 of the aforementioned Constitutional Instrument to examine the assets and other related matters in respect of; Persons who were President, Vice President, Ministers of State, Deputy Ministers; and Heads and Chairmen of Boards of Parastatals, Departments and Agencies within the period from November 2007 to April 2018.

The COI was also to inquire into and investigate whether assets were acquired lawfully unlawfully; to inquire into/or persons who were President, Vice President, Ministers, Ministers of State, Deputy Ministers; and Heads and Chairmen of Boards of Parastatals, Departments and Agencies within the period from November 2007 to April 2018.

In addition, the COI was also to ascertain as to whether the Persons referred to above maintained a standard of life that which was commensurate to their official emoluments; owned or were in control of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to their official emoluments or there is evidence of corruption, dishonesty or abuse of office for private benefit by them; collaborated with any person in respect of such corruption, dishonesty or abuse of office; acted willfully or complacently in such a matter so as to cause financial loss or damage to the Government, Local Authority or Parastatal, including a Public Corporation; and acquired directly or indirectly financial or material gains fraudulently improperly or willfully to the detriment of the Government, Local Authority or Parastatal.

Including a Public Corporation, statutory Commission, Body or University of Sierra Leone to inquire into and investigate any persons or matter as may from time to time be referred to the Commission by His Excellency, the President.

The Appellant thereafter being dissatisfied with the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Sole Commissioner filed a Notice and grounds of appeal on 22nd December, 2020.

The Appellant’s appeal is based on ten grounds which are summarised as thus: The Hon. Justice Biobelle Georgewill erred in law and acted in violation of Section 150 of the Constitution of Sierra Leone, Act No. 6 of 1991, when he proceeded to conduct the commission of Inquiry without the “rules regulating the practice and procedure” of all commissions of Inquiry to be prescribed by the Rules of Court Committee through a constitutional instrument, as provided for under Section 1509 aforesaid.

The adoption by the Hon. Sir Justice Biobelle Georgewill of the Practice Direction formulated by the three Sole Commissioners of Constitutional Instruments No. 64, 65 and 67 of 2018 is unconstitutional and an improper arrogation and usurpation of the functions reserved for the Rules of Court Committee in Section 150 of the 1991 Constitution of Sierra Leone, which provides that “Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, the Rules of Court Committee shall by Constitutional Instrument, make rules regulating the practice and procedure of all Commissions of Inquiry”

Hon. Sir Justice Biobelle Georgewill erred in Law when he impermissibly acted beyond the scope of his Terms of Reference and purported to find the appellant guilty of a criminal offence when he specifically “found the appellant guilty” for the offence of “failing to declare his assets”, an offence provided for under the Anti-Corruption Act 2008 (as amended) and which is exclusively in the domain of the Commissioner of the Anti-Corruption Commissioner was in no way cloaked with the power to indict, prosecute and find the Appellant herein guilty or any other person of interest for the offence of failing to declare assets as required by the Anti-Corruption Act of 2008 (as Amended).

The Sole Commissioner of Commission of Inquiry Constitutional Instrument No, 64 of 2018 erred in Law when he held in Volume One of his Report that

Ministers of Government of which the Appellant was, should bear ultimate responsibility and be held accountable for the affairs and finances of the Ministry they headed.

That the Sole Commissioner erred in holding that “in Law once a prima facie case has been made out, personal rebuttal evidence from the persons of interest is mandatory because without it all the allegations purported by prima facie evidence become duly established by the state”.

The adverse findings of the Hon. Justice Biobelle Georgewill contained in Chapter Two of Volume One (1) of his Report on Commission of Inquiry Constitutional Instrument No. 64 of 2018 dated March 2020 relating to the “Sale of Shares in Sierra Rutile Company (SL) Ltd” are against the weight of the evidence presented.

The facts and evidence adduced and available to the

Hon. Justice Biobelle Georgewill, sitting as Sole Commissioner during the proceedings of Commission of Inquiry No. 64 did not support his specific findings.

That the finds and recommendations against the Appellant contained in Volume One (1) of the Hon. Justice Biobelle Georgewill Report on Commission of Inquiry Constitutional Instrument No. 64 of 2018 dated March 2020, relating to the investigation of the activities of the Ministry of Mines and Mineral Resources and the National Mineral Agency are against the weight of the evidence adduced before the said Commissioner.

The adverse findings of the Hon. Justice Biobelle Georgewill contained in Volume Two (2) of his Report on Commission of Inquiry Constitutional Instrument No. 64 of 2018 dated March 2020, relating to the Appellant’s property situate at Railway Line, Teko Road, Makeni in the Northern Province of the Republic of Sierra Leone are against the weight of the evidence presented.

The testimony and report of CW2, Olu Campbell, which the Learned Sole Commissioner relied on in reaching his findings and recommendations that the appellant’s landed property located at Railway Line, Teko Road, Makeni in the Northern Province of the Republic of Sierra Leone and valued at Le6,400,000,000.

Having been found to be well beyond and far above and therefore not commensurate with, his legitimate means incomes, allowances and other earnings and shall be forfeited forthwith to the Government of Sierra Leone are unreliable and unsafe.

That by failing to publish the complete five (5) volume report of the Hon. Justice Biobelle Georgewill, Commission of Inquiry Constitutional Instrument No.

64 of 2018, section 149(2) of the 1991 Constitution of Sierra Leone has been violated as a partial publication of a Commission report is not a publication of the whole report for the purposes of Section 149(2) of the 1991 Constitution of Sierra Leone.

Latest stories

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once